English Church Architecture.
SOUTH DALTON, St. Mary (SE 967 456), NORTH YORKSHIRE. (Bedrock: Upper Cretaceous, Upper Chalk.)
A church by one of the foremost Victorian church architects, John Loughborough Pearson (1817-97).
This is an astonishing building by Pearson, that could stake a fair claim to be the cathedral of the Yorkshire Wolds. Erected in 1858-61, ostensibly to replace the two dilapidated churches in South Dalton and neighbouring Holme-on-the-Wolds with their combined population of well under a thousand, the building’s size and pretensions were purely a measure of the aspirations of the patron, the third Baron Hotham, who spent £25,000 on it, in order to outdo his land agent and tenant, James Hall, for whom Pearson had very recently designed the already substantial and ornate, St. Leonard’s, Scorborough nearby. (See Anthony Quiney, John Loughborough Pearson, New Haven & London, Yale University Press, 1979, pp. 51-59.) The church is constructed of Steetley stone externally, and white Hildenley stone within; the roofs are covered in Cumberland slates.
Although Pearson joined the Ecclesiological Society belatedly in June 1859, he never featured among the ranks of that Society's most favoured architects. Reviewing the new church in the issue for February 1862 (XXIII/CXLVIII, pp. 60-61), The Ecclesiologist magazine was generally complimentary – indeed, it would have made itself look ridiculous had it been otherwise - yet managed to find a couple of supposed faults: 'The style is Middle-Pointed, of strictly English character, and of a very ornate type... The absence of a stone roof (considering the sumptuousness of the structure) and of colour, constructional or otherwise, is however, to be regretted.' Whether 'colour, constructional or otherwise' was compatible with a 'strictly English character' the reviewer did not venture to say.
The size and elaborate construction of the church are such that the outside and inside must be described independently.
Exterior description. In broad outline, St. Mary’s consists of a superb tower and spire rising to an exceptional 208ʹ (63 m.) and visible for miles around, a large nave without aisles but with a tall and impressive S. porch and large adjoining transepts, and an ornate chancel with a transversely-gabled S. chapel, a cross-gabled organ chamber to the north, and a short, transversely-gabled vestry immediately east of that, with a doorway set askew to the northeast (as seen in the photograph above left, which was taken from the northeast).
Seen from the west, the tower is divided into four stages, of which the lowest is plain except for the frieze of blank quatrefoils at the top, the second is recessed to permit shallow clasping buttresses to sit on the camber below and lit by a four-light W. window with two encircled cinquefoils and an encircled sexfoil in the head, and the third is very short, providing just sufficient height for the clock faces carved in the N. and S. walls. The fourth stage is the bell-stage and a very splendid affair, with three tall gabled openings on each side, separated by buttresses, and low balustrades to the fore, as if to provide precarious viewing platforms behind. In fact, although it is not immediately obvious, the bell-stage actually comprises an irregular octagon, creating space at the corners of the square stage below for tall octagonal turrets to run up to spirelets that terminate about a quarter of the way up the height of the main spire. These are blank beneath the springing level of the bell-openings and decorated above with three tiers of blind rectangles or trefoiled arches. The main spire is tall and slender with no trace of the exaggerated entasis that slightly mars Pearson’s earlier steeples at North Ferriby and Daylesford. It is ribbed and lit by two tiers of gabled lucarnes, with the lower tier facing the cardinal directions and the upper tier, the ordinal.
The S. porch is approached up six steps and vaulted within in two narrow quadripartite bays with ribs of complex profile. It is lit by two trefoil-cusped windows on either side of each bay, save only that the northwestern position is occupied by a narrow doorway replete with short external shafts with large stiff-leaf capitals. The outer doorway has two orders of side-shafts separated by a vertical band of blank quatrefoils and, on either side, a two-bay shallow recess at the springing level, featuring ornamental buttressing. The (principal) inner doorway (illustrated left) is a formidable pièce de résistance, with three orders of side-shafts and an elaborate vertical band of leaf carving, beneath a tympanum pierced by three glazed, encircled sexfoils containing coloured glass that gleam like marble, surrounded by two further bands of leaf carving besides the more usual hollows, rolls and fillets.
The nave, chancel and transept windows are all richly designed and different from their neighbours. The four-light N. and S. windows to the transepts have, in the first case, encircled cinquefoils in the heads of the subarcuated pairs and a double-cusped septfoil in the apex, and in the second, encircled sexfoils over the pairs and a double-cusped trefoil in a rounded triangle in the apex. The sanctuary is highly ornate on all sides: the N. and S. walls are pierced by two-light windows in the centre and one-light windows to left and right, separated by a complicated combination of shafts and buttresses, and sitting on a frieze of quatrefoils and leaf motifs at a height of about 8ʹ (2.4 m.). The five-light E. window (seen right) is announced by blank arches on each side and features outer lights subarcuated over quatrefoils, and a huge wheel in the apex, containing a double-cusped cinquefoil with circles between the foils. (See the entry for Appleton-le-Moors for an explanation of some of these terms.)
The complex union of vestry and organ chamber in the re-entrant between the chancel and N. transept (shown in the photograph at the top of the page) are additions of 1868-72 (see C.M. Smart Jr., Muscular Churches, Fayetteville & London, The University of Arkansas Press, 1989, pp. 118-122) They are lit by a wheel window to the east, formed of five encircled trefoils set within a larger circle with a central quatrefoil, side-shafts, and three little windows of more usual design below – and all this, to decorate a vestry on the side of the building away from the road. The doorway set slightly askew has a trefoil-cusped arch. Quite evidently, the effort and invention that has gone into the design of even the least important features of this church was prodigious and one feels if Pearson had produced nothing else, he would still have earned his place as one of the leaders of the Gothic Revival on the basis of this church alone.
Interior description.
The chancel is entered up two steps through an exceptionally tall arch also of two orders, with semicircular shafts to the inner order and bowtell mouldings to the outer. There is a two-bay arcade on either side of the choir, this time of more usual form. The sanctuary (shown below right) is surrounded by blank arches separated by shafts with leaf capitals - five bays each to the north and south and six to the east - beneath another frieze of leaf carving, roughly 10′ (3 m.) from the floor. The sanctuary windows are recessed behind internal arches, cut through what appears as a separate skin of masonry united to the outer skin by little flying buttresses. The E. window has two orders of side-shafts and a band of carving between, and together with the W. window, contains the only stained glass in the church (by Clayton & Bell), allowing the building to be flooded with light.
|